The "Delivering for America" Plan: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of USPS
The "Delivering for America" plan introduced by Postmaster General Louis DeJoy fundamentally misunderstands the role and purpose of the United States Postal Service (USPS). By attempting to force the USPS to operate like a private freight company such as UPS, DeJoy's plan diverges from the historical and constitutional foundations of the postal service.
A Misguided Approach
The core issue with the "Delivering for America" plan is its focus on making the USPS self-sufficient and profitable. DeJoy's background as a stakeholder in UPS and his appointment to the USPS signal a conflict of interest, where the primary objective seems to be transforming the USPS into a profit-driven entity, similar to UPS.
However, the USPS was never intended to function this way. Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the authority to establish post offices and postal roads, funded through taxation. At the time of the Founding Fathers, there was no expectation for the postal service to be a revenue-generating enterprise. Instead, it was designed as a public good, essential for communication and commerce across a vast and underdeveloped nation.
Historical Context and Constitutional Intent
In the late 18th century, when the postal service was established, the primary mode of communication was through letters, which held little tangible value. The primary goal was to ensure that citizens could communicate across long distances safely and reliably. This required government intervention and support, recognizing that the benefits of a functional postal system far outweighed the costs.
The Founding Fathers were acutely aware that the postal service would operate at a loss. They accepted this as a necessary expense to foster communication, national unity, and economic growth. The concept of profitability was irrelevant because the USPS was seen as an indispensable public service.
The Flaws in the "Delivering for America" Plan
The "Delivering for America" plan boasts of cost savings and financial sustainability. Yet, these savings come at the expense of American jobs, service reliability, and speed. The plan's emphasis on financial metrics neglects the human and social costs of reduced postal services.
Key Issues with the Plan:
1. Job Losses:
The plan's drive for efficiency leads to job cuts, affecting thousands of postal workers and their families. The USPS has long been a major employer, offering stable jobs with good benefits. Reducing the workforce undermines this legacy.
2. Degraded Service:
Efforts to cut costs often result in slower delivery times and less reliable service. This is particularly detrimental in rural areas, where the USPS is a lifeline for many communities.
3. Misaligned Priorities:
The USPS's primary mission is to serve the public, not to generate profit. By focusing on profitability, the plan diverts resources from improving service and maintaining the broad accessibility that has characterized the USPS since its inception.
Conclusion
The "Delivering for America" plan represents a fundamental misstep in understanding the USPS's role in American society. By prioritizing profitability and self-sufficiency, the plan overlooks the historical and constitutional mandate of the postal service as a public good.
Rather than reading and endorsing DeJoy's plan, we must advocate for policies that reinforce the USPS's role as a public service, ensuring that it continues to meet the needs of all Americans, regardless of profitability. The focus should remain on service excellence and accessibility, honoring the true intent behind the establishment of the USPS.
Let us remember that the value of the USPS cannot be measured solely in dollars and cents but in the connections it facilitates and the communities it serves.