Skip to main content

Proposed Constitutional Amendment: Deportation Authority and Judicial Limitation

Proposed Constitutional Amendment: Deportation Authority and Judicial Limitation

Proposed Constitutional Amendment: Deportation Authority and Judicial Limitation

Published: March 31, 2025

Section 1: Limiting Injunction Power of Inferior Federal Courts

No federal court inferior to the Supreme Court of the United States shall have the authority to impose an injunction or stay on any executive order issued under the President’s constitutionally delegated powers concerning the deportation of foreign nationals from the United States, except as provided herein.

Section 2: State Executive Authority in Deportation Cases

In all matters where a foreign national is subject to removal or deportation from the United States, and such individual resides within a specific state, the Governor of that state shall have the authority to issue a temporary veto against the deportation order unless national security concerns are certified as outlined in Section 3.

Section 3: National Security Override Provision

In cases where the grounds for deportation are related to national security, the veto power of a state Governor may be overridden upon the formal declaration and joint certification of two separate military generals, each holding independent command and not subordinate to one another, that such deportation is necessary to protect national security interests of the United States.

Section 4: Clarification on Constitutional Rights

This amendment shall not be construed to authorize the deportation of individuals for exercising any right protected under the Constitution, including but not limited to the freedoms of speech, religion, press, or peaceful assembly. All such removals must be predicated solely on verified threats to national security or lawful violations under existing immigration statutes, and not used to suppress political dissent or beliefs.

Section 5: Presidential Authority Under Article II

This amendment recognizes the President’s authority under Article II of the United States Constitution to execute laws faithfully and secure the nation, but explicitly restricts the use of deportation orders to national security cases when state opposition exists, unless the override provisions of this amendment are satisfied.

Rationale and Historical Context

The rise in judicial activism by lower federal courts—issuing sweeping injunctions against executive immigration policy—has disrupted the balance of powers and diluted the intended role of the states in matters affecting their residents. This amendment reinstates the proper pecking order: the President for national threats, the states for community-integrated residents, and the military as a neutral arbiter in times of extraordinary risk.

By setting clear and fair boundaries, we ensure that the deportation process honors the separation of powers, state sovereignty, military impartiality, and the inalienable rights of individuals, both citizens and non-citizens alike.

Submitted by: Killian Yates

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You can't be like me

You Can't Be Me You Can't Be Me The Role of AI in Personal Growth & Ethical Transparency AI isn’t just for automation or content generation—it can be a powerful tool for personal growth, self-reflection, and effective communication . In the process of sharing my most important writing, I used AI not to replace my voice, but to enhance my ability to present it in a way that ensures clarity, accessibility, and impact. Transparency is essential when using AI in content creation, especially when building trust and credibility . That’s why I’m sharing the full conversation that led to the final presentation of my writing. This isn’t about hiding behind technology—it’s about showing what mindful, responsible AI use can look like in practice. ...

34 Hours - Where are the Ukrainian Children

Public record: documentation of a follow-up email sent to Russian authorities, addressed to Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov, July 2026 — presented in nine languages: English, Russian, Ukrainian, French, Polish, German, Swedish, Italian, and Norwegian. English · Русский · Українська · Français · Polski · Deutsch · Svenska · Italiano · Norsk English To Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov, It has now been approximately 34 hours since I last wrote to you regarding the abducted Ukrainian children. The buses have not stopped. The camps have not emptied. So I write again. This time I will not reiterate the importance of a child's formative years, and I will not explain why the immediate release of these children matters. There is no need. Russia already understands both perfectly — that understanding is the entire reason for the program. You do not steal childhoods unless you know precisely what childhoods are worth. The calculation is transparent: take eno...

Hard as Dolomite

A New Original Song Hard as Dolomite A song about faith, recovery, inner peace, political accountability and refusing to surrender when the fight is worth fighting. Lyrics by Killian Yates Listen to the Full Song Watch the YouTube Short I wrote “Hard as Dolomite” while listening to @ChrisWebby . The lyrics move between faith in Jesus, the discipline required to protect your peace, the reality of addiction and overdose, and the need to confront government officials when public institutions stop listening to the people they serve. The song also connects directly to my continuing advocacy over prisoner communication, the cost of staying connected with incarcerated family members, and the Merriam-Webster Rhyming Dictionary that remained undelivered after arriving at Snake River Correctional Institutio...