Skip to main content

Yates v. United States of America

Federal Complaint - District of Oregon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Killian Yates,
Plaintiff
v.
United States of America,
Defendant.

Case No.: [To be assigned]

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF PETITION, AND EXECUTIVE NEGLIGENCE

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question), § 1346 (U.S. as defendant), and the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

2. Venue is proper in the District of Oregon under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e) as the Plaintiff resides here and no real property is involved.

PARTIES

3. Plaintiff Killian Yates is a private citizen residing in Jackson County, Oregon, with a history of civic participation and constitutional advocacy.

4. Defendant United States of America is the sovereign body responsible for upholding the U.S. Constitution, including the protection of First Amendment rights.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

5. The "We the People" petition platform was created under the Obama administration as a formal channel for citizens to petition the Executive Branch and receive public responses on matters of concern.

6. This platform embodied the spirit and intent of the First Amendment's Petition Clause, operationalizing a way for Americans to directly engage their government in the digital era.

7. Despite its effectiveness and symbolism, the platform was quietly removed without replacement, without public notice, and without any comparable avenue for civic participation established.

8. The reason offered—spam, criticism, and political inconvenience—does not justify the wholesale deletion of a constitutionally significant civic system.

9. This action has left no reliable, accessible method for citizens to petition the Executive Office directly, violating both the spirit and function of the First Amendment.

CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

Count I – Violation of the First Amendment (Petition Clause)

10. The First Amendment guarantees the right "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Disabling the only formal digital portal for such petitioning constitutes a functional denial of this right.

11. The discontinuation of the platform, with no sufficient alternative, is a de facto suppression of lawful public discourse and grievance submission.

Count II – Negligence in Administrative Governance

12. The Executive Branch has a duty to maintain systems it creates that become public channels for constitutionally protected behavior.

13. The removal of the petition site without any security remediation, modernization effort, or public input amounts to administrative negligence and breach of democratic duty.

Count III – Arbitrary and Capricious Action (Violation of APA)

14. Under the Administrative Procedure Act, the removal of a major public program must be done transparently, with public notice and justification.

15. The abandonment of the petition site occurred without public comment or rulemaking and was therefore arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful under 5 U.S.C. § 706.

Count IV – Equal Protection Violation

16. The removal of the system disproportionately harmed politically dissenting voices, denying them the same access to institutional dialogue that others previously enjoyed.

17. There is no legitimate government interest that justifies silencing a constitutionally protected portal to the Executive while preserving less public avenues like closed-door lobbying.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court:

  • A. Declare the removal of the "We the People" petition system unconstitutional without a replacement.
  • B. Order the reinstatement or modernization of a digital petitioning system under the Executive Office of the President.
  • C. Enjoin the Executive Branch from permanently disabling or removing said system without a formal APA process.
  • D. Award symbolic damages in the amount of $1 for the violation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights.
  • E. Grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

Killian Yates
Plaintiff, Pro Se
March 30, 2025

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You can't be like me

You Can't Be Me You Can't Be Me The Role of AI in Personal Growth & Ethical Transparency AI isn’t just for automation or content generation—it can be a powerful tool for personal growth, self-reflection, and effective communication . In the process of sharing my most important writing, I used AI not to replace my voice, but to enhance my ability to present it in a way that ensures clarity, accessibility, and impact. Transparency is essential when using AI in content creation, especially when building trust and credibility . That’s why I’m sharing the full conversation that led to the final presentation of my writing. This isn’t about hiding behind technology—it’s about showing what mindful, responsible AI use can look like in practice. ...
Post a Comment
Read More...

We the People Petition Site - Bald Eagle Party Blog

We the People Petition Site - Bald Eagle Party Blog We the People Petition Site Introduction The "We the People" petition site is an essential platform for American citizens to voice their opinions and bring attention to critical issues. Launched by the Obama administration, this platform allows individuals to create and sign petitions, ensuring their voices are heard by the government. In this blog post, we will explore the significance of this platform, its challenges in recent years, and how it empowers citizens to participate in democracy. History and Background The "We the People" petition site was launched in September 2011 as part of President Obama's commitment to open government and civic engagement. This innovative platform enables citizens to create petitions on various iss...
Post a Comment
Read More...

Direct Line to Killian Yates for Mayor of Central Point

Direct Line to Killian Yates for Mayor of Central Point Hello, I'm Killian Yates , and I'm running for Mayor of Central Point . I believe in real, direct representation, which is why I'm providing my personal text line and email for you to reach me directly. Whether you have questions, concerns, or just want to get to know me better, I'm here to listen— no secretaries, no form responses . Why Direct Contact Matters In today's fast-paced world, it's easy to feel disconnected from those who represent us. My commitment is to bridge that gap and ensure that your voice is heard directly. By providing my personal contact information, I want to foster a sense of community and transparency. Your thoughts, ideas, and feedback are invaluable to me, and I believe that together, we can build a stronger, more ...
Post a Comment
Read More...