Skip to main content

Constitutional Amendment - Medical Autonomy and Reproductive Standards

Constitutional Amendment - Medical Autonomy and Reproductive Standards

Proposed Constitutional Amendment

Protection of Medical Autonomy and Standards of Reproductive Accountability Amendment

Section 1.

The right of an individual to a confidential and autonomous patient-provider relationship shall be inviolable. No law enforcement agency, officer, or agent thereof shall participate in, interfere with, investigate, surveil, or regulate any lawful act or communication between a patient and a licensed healthcare provider regarding diagnosis, treatment, medication, surgery, therapy, or any other form of healthcare delivery.

Section 2.

The regulation, restriction, or interdiction of prescriptions, medications, medical procedures, or healthcare services shall never be subject to law enforcement authority or intervention. All oversight of medical practices shall be conducted exclusively through civilian regulatory and licensing boards composed of qualified medical professionals.

Section 3.

The right to access abortion care shall be maintained as rare, legal, and inconvenient, administered exclusively at the state level. Each state shall establish and maintain a designated precision team of licensed surgeons and support staff whose sole duty is to perform abortion procedures. If the demand for abortion care exceeds the logistical capacity of these designated teams, it shall be recognized not as a failure of access, but as an indicator of a systemic failure in sexual education, responsibility, or social policy, requiring corrective, non-medical interventions.

Section 4.

The manufacture, prescription, sale, or administration of hormonal birth control methods for women, including but not limited to oral contraceptives, injectable contraceptives, hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs), patches, and implants, shall be prohibited nationwide.

Section 5.

No individual shall be permitted to undergo sterilization procedures, including but not limited to tubal ligation, vasectomy, or any other permanent alteration of reproductive capacity, prior to attaining the age of twenty-six (26) years, unless:

  • (a) The procedure is deemed medically necessary to preserve life or prevent grave, imminent harm as determined by two independent licensed physicians; or
  • (b) The individual obtains notarized parental or legal guardian consent if under the age of twenty-six (26).

Section 6.

Congress and the States shall have the power to enforce, through appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You can't be like me

You Can't Be Me You Can't Be Me The Role of AI in Personal Growth & Ethical Transparency AI isn’t just for automation or content generation—it can be a powerful tool for personal growth, self-reflection, and effective communication . In the process of sharing my most important writing, I used AI not to replace my voice, but to enhance my ability to present it in a way that ensures clarity, accessibility, and impact. Transparency is essential when using AI in content creation, especially when building trust and credibility . That’s why I’m sharing the full conversation that led to the final presentation of my writing. This isn’t about hiding behind technology—it’s about showing what mindful, responsible AI use can look like in practice. ...

We the People Petition Site - Bald Eagle Party Blog

We the People Petition Site - Bald Eagle Party Blog We the People Petition Site Introduction The "We the People" petition site is an essential platform for American citizens to voice their opinions and bring attention to critical issues. Launched by the Obama administration, this platform allows individuals to create and sign petitions, ensuring their voices are heard by the government. In this blog post, we will explore the significance of this platform, its challenges in recent years, and how it empowers citizens to participate in democracy. History and Background The "We the People" petition site was launched in September 2011 as part of President Obama's commitment to open government and civic engagement. This innovative platform enables citizens to create petitions on various iss...

Threats United States national security and space dominance

Threat Analysis: The Strategic Risks of Japan/India/UK Space Capabilities on U.S. Military Space Assets and National Security Killian H. Yates | Sunday, February 23, 2025 www.LinkedIn.com/in/KillianYates United States of America Executive Summary Japan’s advancements in space debris removal technologies—especially through initiatives like Astroscale and JAXA’s Commercial Removal of Debris Demonstration (CRD2) program—pose a dual-use risk to U.S. military assets in space. While these capabilities are publicly focused on maintaining space sustainability, their precision and operational flexibility could be repurposed to undermine U.S. space dominance. This paper explores the specific threats these technologies pose to U.S. military space infrastructure and examines the strategic implications of a potential shift in space power dynamics. 1. Overview of Japan’s Space Debris Capabilities Astroscale and JAXA Initiatives: ADRAS-J and ADRAS-J2 spacecraft demonstrate advan...