Global Coastal Accord
An Open Treaty for the Global Transition from Nuclear Energy to Tidal and Clean Power
Preamble: We, the undersigned nations, recognizing the immense destructive potential of nuclear energy, both in military and civilian form, and united by a commitment to planetary stewardship and intergenerational justice, do hereby establish this cooperative agreement. In the pursuit of peace, sustainability, and equity among all peoples, we acknowledge our shared responsibility to dismantle dangerous energy dependencies and replace them with sustainable alternatives.
Article I: Denuclearization Commitment
1. Signatories agree to phase out nuclear power generation facilities within a mutually agreed upon timeline not exceeding 25 years from the date of ratification.
2. Immediate investments will be directed to secure and environmentally sound decommissioning operations, monitored by a new Global Coastal Energy Oversight Commission (GCEOC).
3. Nuclear waste management and storage protocols will be coordinated internationally to prevent environmental, health, and geopolitical hazards.
Article II: Tidal Energy as a Primary Pathway
1. Coastal nations commit to harnessing their marine geography by prioritizing the development of tidal, wave, and ocean current energy systems.
2. Technical schematics, patents, and engineering knowledge related to tidal energy infrastructure shall be shared openly among signatories to reduce cost and redundancy.
3. Coastal nations further agree to designate surplus capacity from their tidal energy projects for use by inland or landlocked partners under Clean Power Exchange Compacts (CPECs).
Article III: Interim Use of Fossil Fuels for Landlocked Nations
1. Until adequate infrastructure for clean energy transmission is established, fossil fuels shall be used sparingly and strategically for essential services in landlocked countries, with a commitment to minimize emissions.
2. Coastal nations agree to preferentially assume the burden of fossil fuel combustion to generate electricity for inland use, thereby isolating emissions to lower-risk zones.
Article IV: Coordinated Innovation Initiatives
1. A Global Energy Innovation Fund (GEIF) shall be established, funded proportionally by each signatory, to drive advancements in geothermal, solar, wind, kinetic microgeneration, and bioengineered fuels.
2. All new innovations shall be treated as global commons for the duration of the treaty and subject to mandatory international licensing terms to prevent monopolization.
Article V: Peaceful Energy Use Guarantees
1. All energy infrastructure and data sharing under this treaty shall be used exclusively for peaceful civilian purposes.
2. A rotating independent tribunal shall monitor for violations, with powers to sanction or embargo non-compliant parties.
Article VI: Entry Into Force and Accession
1. This treaty shall enter into force upon ratification by a minimum of 30 nuclear energy-capable nations.
2. Any nation not initially party may accede at any time by submitting a declaration of adherence and transition plan to the GCEOC.
Signatures and Ratification
The undersigned, duly authorized representatives of their respective nations, hereby sign the Global Coastal Accord and commit to its principles and implementation strategies in good faith and with mutual respect.
Representative Name
Country / Nation
Representative Name
Country / Nation
Representative Name
Country / Nation
Nuclear Capabilities of Nations
| Nation | Nuclear Energy Capable | Nuclear Weapon Capable | Holds Nuclear Weapons for Other Countries | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Yes (Largest capacity in 2024: 102 GW) | Yes (Acknowledged possessor) | Yes (Hosts US nuclear weapons in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and Turkey) | Has conducted nuclear tests. Part of the "Nuclear Five" recognized under the NPT. |
| France | Yes (Second largest capacity in 2024: 64 GW) | Yes (Acknowledged possessor) | No | Has conducted nuclear tests. Part of the "Nuclear Five" recognized under the NPT. |
| China | Yes (Third largest capacity in 2024: 58 GW, projected to be largest) | Yes (Acknowledged possessor) | No | Has conducted nuclear tests. Part of the "Nuclear Five" recognized under the NPT. Increasing warhead stockpile. |
| Russia | Yes (Fourth largest capacity in 2024: 29 GW) | Yes (Acknowledged possessor, successor to the Soviet Union) | Yes (Has stated it would move some nuclear weapons to Belarus) | Has conducted nuclear tests. Part of the "Nuclear Five" recognized under the NPT. Largest number of nuclear warheads. |
| South Korea | Yes (Fifth largest capacity in 2024: 27 GW) | No | No | Focuses on nuclear energy production. |
| Canada | Yes (Sixth largest capacity in 2024: 15 GW) | No | No | Focuses on nuclear energy production. |
| United Kingdom | Yes | Yes (Acknowledged possessor) | No | Has conducted nuclear tests. Part of the "Nuclear Five" recognized under the NPT. |
| India | Yes | Yes (Declared possessor) | No | Has conducted nuclear tests. Not a party to the NPT. Increasing warhead stockpile. |
| Pakistan | Yes | Yes (Declared possessor) | No | Has conducted nuclear tests. Not a party to the NPT. Increasing warhead stockpile. |
| North Korea | Yes (Limited, small power plant) | Yes (Declared possessor) | No | Has conducted nuclear tests. Announced withdrawal from the NPT. Increasing warhead stockpile. |
| Israel | Yes (Research reactors) | Yes (Believed to possess) | No | Believed to possess nuclear weapons but maintains a policy of ambiguity. Not a party to the NPT. |
| Belgium | Yes | No | Yes (Hosts US nuclear weapons) | Focuses on nuclear energy production. |
| Germany | Yes | No | Yes (Hosts US nuclear weapons) | Focuses on nuclear energy production. |
| Italy | Yes (Phasing out) | No | Yes (Hosts US nuclear weapons) | Currently phasing out nuclear power. |
| Netherlands | Yes | No | Yes (Hosts US nuclear weapons) | Focuses on nuclear energy production. |
| Turkey | No (Building) | No | Yes (Hosts US nuclear weapons) | Currently building nuclear power plants. |
| Belarus | Yes (Operates reactors) | No | Yes (Will host Russian nuclear weapons) | Operates nuclear power plants and has agreed to host Russian nuclear weapons. |
| Ukraine | Yes | No | No | Significant nuclear energy capacity. |
| Japan | Yes | No | No | Significant nuclear energy capacity. May have developed enrichment for hedging. |
| Spain | Yes | No | No | Significant nuclear energy capacity. |
| Sweden | Yes | No | No | Significant nuclear energy capacity. |
| Finland | Yes | No | No | Significant nuclear energy capacity. |
| Belgium | Yes | No | Yes (Hosts US nuclear weapons) | Significant nuclear energy capacity. |
| United Arab Emirates | Yes | No | No | Developing significant nuclear energy capacity. |
| Czech Republic | Yes | No | No | Significant nuclear energy capacity. |
| Bulgaria | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| Hungary | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| Slovakia | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| Switzerland | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| Armenia | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| Slovenia | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| South Africa | Yes | No (Previously had, dismantled) | No | Previously developed and dismantled nuclear weapons. |
| Brazil | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| Mexico | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| Romania | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| Iran | Yes (Research reactor, building power plant) | No (Suspected past interest) | No | Has a nuclear program, with past suspicions of weaponization efforts. |
| Argentina | Yes | No | No | Operates nuclear power plants. |
| Pakistan | Yes | Yes (Declared possessor) | No | Has conducted nuclear tests. Not a party to the NPT. Increasing warhead stockpile. |
| Bangladesh | No (Building) | No | No | Building its first nuclear power plant. |
| Egypt | No (Building) | No | No | Plans to build nuclear power plants. |
| Indonesia | No (Planning) | No | No | Has plans for nuclear power. |
| Kenya | No (Planning) | No | No | Has plans for nuclear power. |
| Kazakhstan | No (Planning) | No | No | Has plans for nuclear power. |
| Uzbekistan | No (Planning) | No | No | Has plans for nuclear power. |
| Philippines | No (Planning) | No | No | Has plans for nuclear power. |
| Poland | No (Planning) | No | No | Has plans for nuclear power. |
Nuclear Nations by Landlocked Status
Nuclear Weapon Capable Nations with Coastlines:
- United States
- France
- China
- Russia
- United Kingdom
- India
- Pakistan
- North Korea
- Israel
The majority of nations that have declared or are believed to possess nuclear weapons have coastlines. This geographic feature can provide strategic advantages for deployment, potentially through naval assets, and for broader geopolitical reach.
Nuclear Weapon Capable Nations that are Landlocked:
Based on the current understanding and the data presented in the table, there are no acknowledged or believed nuclear weapon capable nations that are entirely landlocked. This might reflect historical strategic considerations related to access and deployment capabilities.
Nations Hosting Nuclear Weapons (with Coastlines):
- Belgium
- Germany
- Italy
- Netherlands
- Turkey
All the nations currently hosting nuclear weapons belonging to other countries have coastlines. This could be related to logistical and strategic considerations within the alliances and agreements governing the deployment of these weapons.
Nations Hosting Nuclear Weapons (Landlocked):
- Belarus
Belarus is a landlocked nation that has agreed to host Russian nuclear weapons, marking a notable exception to the trend observed with other host nations.
Nuclear Energy Capable Nations (Landlocked, No Weapons):
- Belarus
- Ukraine
- Czech Republic
- Hungary
- Slovakia
- Switzerland
- Armenia
- Slovenia
- Kazakhstan
- Uzbekistan
- Poland
Several landlocked nations have developed significant nuclear energy capabilities for peaceful purposes, demonstrating that access to a coastline is not a prerequisite for engaging with nuclear technology for energy production.
Nuclear Energy Capable Nations (with Coastlines, No Weapons):
- South Korea
- Canada
- Japan
- Spain
- Sweden
- Finland
- United Arab Emirates
- South Africa
- Brazil
- Mexico
- Romania
- Iran
- Argentina
- Bangladesh
- Egypt
- Indonesia
- Kenya
- Philippines
A significant number of nations with coastlines have also focused on developing nuclear energy programs without pursuing nuclear weapons. Their coastal access might facilitate the import of nuclear materials and the management of nuclear facilities, particularly concerning cooling water.
Contact Information for Heads of Government in Nuclear-Capable Nations
Below is a more comprehensive list of contact information for the heads of government in nations with nuclear capabilities. Please note that direct contact may not always be the most effective way to voice your concerns, and engaging with your own elected officials or relevant international organizations is also crucial.
| Nation | Head of Government | Official Government Website / Contact Info |
|---|---|---|
| United States | President | Contact the White House |
| France | President | Write to the President of the Republic (French) |
| China | President (though Premier is head of government) | The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China (General Information) |
| Russia | President (though Prime Minister is head of government) | Send a message to the President of Russia |
| United Kingdom | Prime Minister | Contact the Prime Minister's Office |
| India | Prime Minister | Connect with the Prime Minister of India |
| Pakistan | Prime Minister | Prime Minister's Office, Pakistan (General Information) |
| North Korea | Chairman of the State Affairs Commission (de facto head of state) | Contact information is not publicly available. Diplomatic channels are typically used. |
| Israel | Prime Minister | Prime Minister's Office - Contact Us |
Important Considerations:
- Language: When contacting foreign governments, consider writing in a widely understood language like English or, if possible, the official language of the country.
- Respectful Communication: Maintain a respectful and polite tone in your communication.
- Focus: Clearly and concisely state your message regarding denuclearization.
- Alternative Channels: Remember that contacting your own elected officials and supporting organizations working on disarmament can also be effective ways to advocate for denuclearization.
- Data Privacy: Be mindful of data privacy and security when using online contact forms.
- Government Structure: Be aware that some nations have a President as the head of state and a Prime Minister as the head of government. Ensure you are directing your communication appropriately.
- Response Volume: Heads of government receive a high volume of correspondence, and a direct personal response is unlikely. Your message will likely be handled by their staff.
- Consider Other Officials: Depending on your specific concern, contacting relevant ministers (e.g., Foreign Affairs, Defense) or members of parliament might also be a valuable approach.