Skip to main content

Request to Governor Kotek - unlawful civil rights violation at Oregon State hospital

Public Record: Request for Review – Oregon State Hospital Legal Access Restrictions

Public Record: Request for Review – Oregon State Hospital Legal Access Restrictions

Publication Date: February 18, 2026


Introduction

This post serves as a public record of a formal communication submitted to the Office of Governor Tina Kotek through the official contact form on the State of Oregon website.

The purpose of publishing this communication is to ensure transparency, preserve documentation, and establish a clear timeline of notice provided to state leadership regarding conditions at the Oregon State Hospital that may impact patients’ ability to access legal materials, obtain copies, and meaningfully participate in their legal proceedings.

When concerns involve constitutional rights and access to the courts, it is important that notice is not only provided through internal systems but also preserved in a public forum. This record exists to document that notice has been given and to ensure accountability for any actions taken, or not taken, in response.


Message Submitted to the Office of Governor Tina Kotek

Governor Kotek,

I am writing to formally request your review and intervention regarding policies and practices at the Oregon State Hospital that interfered with my ability, as a civilly committed patient, to access legal materials, obtain copies, and meaningfully participate in my legal proceedings.

While a patient at the hospital, I submitted multiple written requests for legal materials, copies of grievances and documents, and constitutional and statutory resources necessary to prepare for and communicate in my case. These requests were directed to my assigned social worker, unit staff, and the program director, and I also filed formal grievances documenting these concerns.

I was repeatedly informed that all legal copies had to be made exclusively during scheduled law library time. However, law library access was limited to approximately 30–45 minutes per week, and this time was required to cover legal research, printing, and copying. There were no accommodations made for canceled sessions, and staff declined to provide requested materials directly. As a result, I was required to choose between researching applicable law, printing statutes, or making copies of documents necessary to communicate with my attorney, the court, and other officials.

In addition, I requested a copy of the hospital policy being cited to justify these restrictions. Supervisory staff acknowledged the request and indicated that a copy would be provided, but despite multiple follow-ups, no policy was ever produced.

I maintained contemporaneous documentation of these events, including communication forms, grievances, and a detailed log of interactions with staff and supervisors. These records demonstrate repeated notice to hospital personnel and a failure to take corrective action.

I have also previously contacted the Oregon Attorney General’s Office regarding these concerns, providing notice of the limitations on access to legal materials and copies, as well as related issues affecting my ability to participate in my legal proceedings. To date, these concerns remain unresolved.

The practical effect of these policies and practices was to interfere with my ability to assist in my own defense and to access the courts. While I was provided with legal counsel, the restrictions placed on access to materials and copying limited my ability to prepare, document concerns, and communicate effectively regarding my case.

I am requesting that your office review:

  • The adequacy of law library access for patients at the Oregon State Hospital
  • Policies governing access to legal materials and copying
  • Procedures for providing patients with copies of grievances and legal documents
  • Whether current practices meet constitutional standards for meaningful access to the courts

I also request that policies relied upon by staff be made available to patients upon request and that reasonable accommodations be implemented to ensure patients are not prevented from participating in their legal proceedings.

This issue reflects a broader systemic concern affecting patients who rely on the hospital for both care and access to the legal process.

I am prepared to provide documentation supporting these concerns upon request.

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Killian Yates


Closing Statement

This publication is intended to preserve an accurate and timestamped record of communication with state leadership. When issues involving access to legal processes arise within state institutions, transparency and accountability are essential.

Any response, action, or lack thereof from the Office of the Governor will be documented as part of an ongoing effort to ensure that systems operating under the authority of the State of Oregon meet constitutional standards and uphold the rights of those in their custody.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You can't be like me

You Can't Be Me You Can't Be Me The Role of AI in Personal Growth & Ethical Transparency AI isn’t just for automation or content generation—it can be a powerful tool for personal growth, self-reflection, and effective communication . In the process of sharing my most important writing, I used AI not to replace my voice, but to enhance my ability to present it in a way that ensures clarity, accessibility, and impact. Transparency is essential when using AI in content creation, especially when building trust and credibility . That’s why I’m sharing the full conversation that led to the final presentation of my writing. This isn’t about hiding behind technology—it’s about showing what mindful, responsible AI use can look like in practice. ...

Threats United States national security and space dominance

Threat Analysis: The Strategic Risks of Japan/India/UK Space Capabilities on U.S. Military Space Assets and National Security Killian H. Yates | Sunday, February 23, 2025 www.LinkedIn.com/in/KillianYates United States of America Executive Summary Japan’s advancements in space debris removal technologies—especially through initiatives like Astroscale and JAXA’s Commercial Removal of Debris Demonstration (CRD2) program—pose a dual-use risk to U.S. military assets in space. While these capabilities are publicly focused on maintaining space sustainability, their precision and operational flexibility could be repurposed to undermine U.S. space dominance. This paper explores the specific threats these technologies pose to U.S. military space infrastructure and examines the strategic implications of a potential shift in space power dynamics. 1. Overview of Japan’s Space Debris Capabilities Astroscale and JAXA Initiatives: ADRAS-J and ADRAS-J2 spacecraft demonstrate advan...

Declaration of the American People: Revocation of Donald J. Trump’s Return

Declaration of the American People: Revocation of Donald J. Trump’s Return Declaration of the American People Revocation of Donald J. Trump’s Visa and Prohibition of His Return Pending Constitutional Convention Published: April 26, 2025 We, the People of the United States of America — the rightful and ultimate sovereigns of this Nation — hereby DECLARE that Donald John Trump’s privileges to enter, reside in, or act within the jurisdiction of the United States are REVOKED , effective immediately. By this declaration, we assert: That the People possess an inalienable right to withdraw confidence from any individual who threatens the integrity of our Republic, irrespective of title or past office. That the sovereignty of the People supersedes any position or office, including the Presidency, and that the sacred trust between the governed and those in power...